Friday, 22 August 2014

“Action and Reaction Are Equal But Opposite": The Sen. Ballout Citizenship Situation



Sen. John Akel Ballout, Snr, is a current senator of Maryland County. He and I developed a problem over the short time I am visiting Liberia as a volunteer worker. And this problem has reached an alarming stage. The reason why it reached this stage is because the young man is confused who his perceived political enemies are. He thinks I’m one. But I am not!

See, I came to Liberia on my own account and volition. I reside in the United States of America. I know it is difficult for the ordinary person to comprehend why a young man like me would chooses such a task – work as a volunteer within a revolutionary thought process.

See, I read Ernesto Che Guevara, Frantz Fannon, Walter Rodney, Fidel Castro and many other revolutionaries who came long before me all the time. I began reading about them since I was a high school teen. One day, in life, I thought I would do some of the things they have done or continue to do. They left their own personal successes where they were born or grew up and attending universities to go out and “ground” with their people and others in other countries. That’s why today I am fully engaged in this sort of work to move my nation and people into modernity. This decision on my part to leave all I have worked for in the US and come to a “dry” land to work and hope to achieve progress for the people and nation is domestically costly to me. But if a man decides to stand up for what he believes, he has to pay the price that comes with the belief he holds. That man needs not complain. That’s why I am not complaining of all the ills that befall me in the process. I am up and measured to the task. Let those who wish to rip apart my character and/or my reason to work as I do, do so freely. But I can assure them, they cannot undermine my work. After all, I have passed the most troubling stage of this work in Liberia. The time I thought I would fail but did not, has passed on. I’ve swallowed the Pain. I went through it all like a man. It hurt. But it is paying off! Everything else now, is as cool as cold water.

Let me convict myself before I convict Sen. John Ballout.

Normally, I won’t hang around individuals a lot. Because there is tendency in our Liberian setting to get used to certain people and then don’t correct them when they go wrong. Because if get used to them and correct them when they go wrong, they take serious offense. They feel shouldn’t correct them. Because you are a friend of theirs. For me, I don’t believe this at all. I believe I should tell my friends the truth. Because when I lie to them, then I am not a good friend to them. Here is the mistake I made in the John Ballout case for which I must chastise myself: Sen. Ballout drew me too close to him. And I sort of let myself go all the way. See, Sen. Ballout is a man who doesn’t like the truth to be told to him in his face. Even how hard one tries to do so in privacy, he takes serious offense. And you what else he does? He keeps speech. And leaders should practice keeping speech from his or her citizens and/or constituents simply because that citizen criticizes him. So I was wrong to allow myself to get too closed to the Senator. It made him feel I would pat him on the back if he did wrong. During the time I was closed to him, he did me favors. Actually, I don’t think they were favors that he did me. He was using me to cover up some of his wrongdoings. But little did I know all this until when we fell off. I was definitely wrong having not told him that I never compromise principles. I was wrong I did not tell him equivocally that I hold allegiance to a Cause not to individuals. Up to now, I still believe he and I have allegiance to the Cause of Maryland. And there’s where I thought he and I were standing for Maryland. I thought we were pursuing Maryland issues together. And that he and I know that without him or me, Maryland has to still move on.

I told him Ballout that I do not believe in the “slap-one-jaw-and-show-the -other jaw” sort of principle for peace. I told him that I believe in the “Tooth for a tooth” principle – The Law of Retribution! Since I consider myself as a true revolutionary, a progressive and a decent man, I always have respect for every human person (old, young, rich, poor &c). But I categorically emphasized that I however do no bow down to any man! I obey all laws. And I love everyone. But if anyone put his hands on me, I surely will send him to the cemetery without a second thought. I impressed upon him I believe all humans should respect each other irrespective of status in society. So, if anyone insults me and I caution him to discontinue, but chooses not to stop, I am under obligation to defend myself. And there’s where self-defense comes in. I informed Sen. Ballout on all of these. Probably I did not make myself very clear. So he fails to learn. If I did not make all of these things crystal clear to Sen. Ballout, then I take the responsibility for not being able to educate him as to who I am and what I stand for. Therefore, I convict myself on that ground!

Now, let me convict Sen. Ballout.

The Sen. is an arrogant man. He’s power drunk! He doesn’t take advice. He is antagonistic. I know all this because he shows all this to me. Let me drive you through the point that makes me attack his citizenship. I’m in Liberia for three years. I work from village to village; from city to city and from hamlet to hamlet. In many cases I try to connect Sen. Ballout with my work. But the Senator decides to attack me for no apparent reason. At one point I ignore his attacks. But the more I try to ignore his attacks, the more he keeps coming at me. I had to put on my “No nonsense” gloves and boots to repel him. He keeps on attacking me in the public. He says I come to Liberia calling myself revolutionary. But according to him, I have not visited my late Father’s hometown. What he means by that baffles, my mind. I begin to ask myself why would this man choose to attack me on grounds I refuse to go to my Dad’s hometown. I can’t figure this out! At one point I thought he was just trying to be funny. Because I did not come to Liberia to serve one group of people. I see Liberia as one people one destiny. When he continued this tendency, I began to think he was not joking anymore. Because he won’t relent. Certainly, I feel he is seriously undermining my work. So I seriously warned him. I explained why I am not visiting my late Dad’s hometown. But the warning does him no good. I guess he thought he had me cornered. Every time I try to explain about my work to my people and what I see as the problem in our country, Sen. Ballout tried to undermine. But check this out: Ballout himself has not been to his Father’s hometown in Palestine.

Well, just so you know, my late Father’s hometown is Rocktown in Maryland County. Ballout is correct when he says I had not been there until just recently. When I got in Maryland, I took my Program to Barrobo which is far away from my Father’s hometown. Most people thought I would have focused on my late Dad’s hometown. But I didn’t. The reason is, in the US, I helped organized a group of individuals from my Dad’s hometown. Together we began to help the Town. Today, it has one of the best educational systems in the rest of the villages in the entire Maryland. So when I got to Maryland, I thought I should help decentralize development. So I went to other villages other than my late Dad’s. This is what Sen. Ballout has been using against me. As a result, Sen. Ballout forces me to defend myself. He forces me to ask him if at he has ever visited his late dad’s hometown (Palestine) if he thinks I have not visited mine (Rocktown). I think this is as fair as it can be. Our Immigration and Naturalization laws, ours is Patrilineal (that means we look at where your father comes from). It is not matrilineal (where your mother comes from). Because our Constitution emphatically states that only people of Negro descent can become citizens of Liberia. Now watch the tricky part. The Constitution states this OPENLY. But the Liberia Immigration & Naturalization Laws defines and restricts the Stipulation. It addresses issue in this way. If one is born on to one parent (most especially the father) who is not of Negro descent, that one will have to choose his or her citizenship at the age of 18 in a court of competent jurisdiction. If he or she fails to do so, he or she forfeits Liberian citizenship. This is just a gist! In Sen. Ballout’s case, it is he who has the problem not me. My late Dad and mother are all of Negro descent. My Dad comes from Rocktown. Sen. Ballout is correct. I barely visit the place. But does that mean I don’t care fro where my late Dad’s from? As for him (Sen. Ballout) his dad is from Palestine. His dad was not a Negro or of Negro descent up to his passing. And so if he (Sen. Ballout) will use the fact that I barely visit my father’s hometown as a way of trying to demoralize me, he needs to think again. Because he will be under obligation to tell us if he has ever visited his father’s hometown in Palestine. And that upon reaching maturity has renounced any other citizenship acquired by virtue of one of his parent being a citizen of another country?

This is what the Constitution of Liberia says on the citizenship question of those with one parent a citizen of Liberia and the other of another country who’s not of Negro descent: 

Article 28   “Any person, at least one of whose parents was a citizen of Liberia at the time of the person's birth, shall be a citizen of Liberia; provided that any such person shall upon reaching maturity renounce any other citizenship acquired by virtue of one parent being a citizen of another country . No citizen of the Republic shall be deprived of citizenship or nationality except as provided by law; and no person shall be denied the right to change citizenship or nationality.”

No comments:

Post a Comment